Serving the Flathead Valley & Montana since 2006. A reality based independent journal of observation & analysis. © James Conner.

 

13 July 2014

The Flathead’s in the Border Patrol’s “Papers, please” zone

Two of every three Americans live within 100 miles of our international borders, land and coastal. In Montana the 100-mile zone extends from the Canadian border south to 47.55° North Latitude, as displayed on these maps:

flathead_papers_please_zone
aclu_constitution_free_map
Map from ACLU’s constitution-free web page.

Within the 100-mile zone, our constitutional rights to due process of law and unreasonable searches and seizures are diminished. Along our southern Border with Mexico not only are there fences, electronic surveillance, drones looking for smugglers and illegal immigrants, and patrols in the desert, there are U.S. Border Patrol checkpoints surrounding American towns where even native born American citizens are subjected to the police state assumption that everyone is guilty until proven otherwise.

Every morning at the checkpoint on Arivaca Road, about 25 miles from the Mexican border and about 20 miles from the center of this community, school buses full of children get stopped. A minibus that takes older residents on weekly shopping trips also gets stopped.

Unlike frequent border crossers, who carry cards granting them faster entry in the United States, there is no special designation for drivers who frequently pass through checkpoints. The thinking is that anyone could be a smuggler, so everyone must be stopped.

American law treats our borders as special places, where our constitutional rights exist, to the extent they exist at all, in a Constitutional twilight zone, reports the American Civil Liberties Union:

  • Normally under the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, the American people are not generally subject to random and arbitrary stops and searches.

  • The border, however, has always been an exception. There, the longstanding view is that the normal rules do not apply. For example the authorities do not need a warrant or probable cause to conduct a “routine search.”

  • But what is “the border”? According to the government, it is a 100-mile wide strip that wraps around the “external boundary” of the United States.

  • As a result of this claimed authority, individuals who are far away from the border, American citizens traveling from one place in America to another, are being stopped and harassed in ways that our Constitution does not permit.

  • Border Patrol has been setting up checkpoints inland — on highways in states such as California, Texas and Arizona, and at ferry terminals in Washington State. Typically, the agents ask drivers and passengers about their citizenship. Unfortunately, our courts so far have permitted these kinds of checkpoints – legally speaking, they are “administrative” stops that are permitted only for the specific purpose of protecting the nation’s borders. They cannot become general drug-search or other law enforcement efforts. [Emphasis added.]

  • However, these stops by Border Patrol agents are not remaining confined to that border security purpose. On the roads of California and elsewhere in the nation – places far removed from the actual border – agents are stopping, interrogating, and searching Americans on an everyday basis with absolutely no suspicion of wrongdoing.

According to the New York Times:

The checkpoints have been most successful at finding drugs, seizing 342,624 pounds of marijuana in fiscal 2013, or 14 percent of the 2.4 million pounds of marijuana confiscated by the agents along the northern and southern borders. They were also responsible for intercepting more than half of the heroin, cocaine and methamphetamine seized by the Border Patrol over the past four fiscal years, the statistics show.

But only 2 percent of the unauthorized immigrants captured by the Border Patrol in each of the past four fiscal years were apprehended at checkpoints, according to statistics provided by Customs and Border Protection. There were 9,510 such apprehensions in fiscal 2013, out of 420,789 apprehensions by the agency.

Furthermore, reports the NY Times, Customs and Border Protection believes its powers extend everywhere.

Under Supreme Court precedent, the Border Patrol is allowed to conduct random stops at checkpoints within 100 miles of the border, a power that the agency says is critical to its task of keeping drugs, guns and people from illegally entering the country.

The Border Patrol’s parent agency, Customs and Border Protection, said in a statement that existing laws give its agents broad powers to question and arrest people and to seize evidence, and that those powers are not bound by geographic restrictions. The agents, the statement said, “enforce the nation’s laws while preserving the civil rights and civil liberties of all people” with whom they interact.

Possibly Customs and Border Protection is referring to customs stations in airports such as Denver’s that receive flights originating in other nations. Possibly. But has any law enforcement agency ever taken a minimalist view of its powers?

Osama bin Laden launched the 9/11 attacks to goad America into curtailing its own freedoms. Late on 11 September 2001, when it was obvious that the attacks were over, and no more would be forthcoming any time soon, I thought we would pick ourselves up, dust ourselves off, resume our normal activities, and show bin Laden and his bloodthirsty associates that Americans would not be intimidated by a couple of aircraft hijackings, some property damage, and 3,000 murders. I was wrong. We gave up freedoms and still felt frightened. Bin Laden won.

And the Republicans are wrong. Our borders are not insecure. Quite the contrary. They’re too damn secure for our own good.