A reality based independent journal of observation & analysis, serving the Flathead Valley & Montana since 2006. © James Conner.

10 March 2015

Democrats developing an irrational fear of contested primaries

Why are national Democrats so fearful of primary elections? Consider just these recent events:

Because California has a top two primary, a crowded field is dangerous. It’s actually possible that although the state is heavily Democratic, too many Democrats in the primary could result in two Republicans — and not one Democrat — being on the general election ballot for U.S. Senator. In California, there’s a valid argument for trying to anoint a nominee before the primary.

In Maryland, there’s a glut of Democrats. Smart, experienced, liberal, Van Hollen would be my choice. Donna Edwards is a black woman. Race and gender identity politics could dominate this primary. That’s never good.

Ted Strickland, a former Ohio governor, is too old to be running for the Senate. Democratic leaders are backing him because he has high name recognition. If he doesn't die before the primary, he’ll probably win the nomination. Then he’ll lose the election. Why Democrats think that’s good for Ohio remains to be explained.

Hillary Clinton is 67 years old, and looks and acts it. Her training and instincts are those of a secrecy obsessed corporate lawyer. She lacks to the judgment to be trusted as the number one person in any situation, and she lacks the personality and judgment for public service in any capacity. She’s proved that time and again. She’s the high priestess of gender identity politics, the Big Dawg’s hubby, the Lady MacBeth of American politics. Don’t run, damned candidate, don’t run.